KEEP it real: making professional development stick in 16-19 settings

26 January 2026

James Wilson is Head of Teaching and Learning, a BTEC physics teacher as well as Partnership Director for the EEF 16–19 Evidence Partnership.

James Wilson

Head of Teaching and Learning

Exeter College has 14 faculties, a sixth form of over 8,000 students and a team of inspiring and experienced Advanced Teaching Practitioners (ATPs) who provide support and lead on PD within faculties and across the college.

Here’s a truth we don’t always say out loud, at least not loudly: most professional development (PD) doesn’t change classroom practice. We run sessions, we listen, we take notes…and then the real world hits: timetable pressure, piles of marking, and students to support. Changing what we do in the classroom can be hard and, just like students, staff need time to try new things, practise, and reflect.

The EEF recently released its guidance on effective professional development in 16–19 settings (EEF, 2025). The guidance and its specific audience of 16-19 colleges makes it a compelling read and one that fits well with our own college targets and previous PD insights. What changes teaching is structured practice, shared language, and time to reflect, not just a transfer of information. Improving outcomes for disadvantaged students is at the heart of everything that the EEF does and this report is no different: high quality PD leads to proportionally better outcomes for disadvantaged students.

What is the KEEP Framework?

One thing we have found helpful within the guidance is the KEEP framework:

  • Knowledge – clarity on what’s being learned and why
  • Engagement – motivation, relevance, and shared purpose
  • Execution – modelling, rehearsal, feedback, and adaptation
  • Practice – ongoing support to build habits, not one-offs

How is PD targeted at Exeter College?

Making PD targeted and useful for all can be particularly tricky in a large FE college where faculties might experience significant differences in course structures, students and the challenges they face.

Knowledge: Each year, we set one whole-college pedagogical focus that is informed by learning walks, our observation cycle, and staff feedback. This year, it is helping students to “think harder” (Coe et al., 2014) through metacognitive (EEF, 2025) and other pedagogical strategies. Faculties then shape this in ways that fit their learners and curriculum, with the Head of Faculty and faculty ATP gathering together inputs from staff. This brings coherence without homogeneity.

Engagement: Rather than compliance-based PD, staff work within faculties in mixed-experience trios. These trios choose specific strategies to trial, linked to the college and faculty focus but relevant to their reality.

Execution: We have three trios observation cycles within the academic year and, for each one, colleagues observe the learning in the classes of their trio partners as they try out their new in-class strategy. These are low-stakes settings which reduces anxiety and builds confidence, especially for early career teachers.

Practice: Our observation cycles are bookended by PD days, giving trios protected time to plan timings and test out ideas from the faculty Advanced Teaching Practitioner, and then reflect on their trios experiences and refine their practice. Outputs are shared within faculty discussions, on postcards on a faculty staffroom feedback board and curated on our Teaching & Learning Hub. This builds habits, community and a steady spread of effective practice, not fads. It is important that this process is separate from our performance management cycle: the aim is growth, not judgement.

What have we learned?

Coherence matters. Time matters. Relationships matter. And while professional development delivery will always be complex in a large FE college, designing for behaviour change (not just knowledge transfer) is already improving confidence, collaboration and student thinking.

Why not try one or more of these in your setting?

  • Choose one college-wide pedagogical aim and support faculties to translate it.
  • Use trios for supportive, shared practice, with time on PD days to plan and reflect.
  • Schedule PD cycles, not single events.
  • Keep PD separate from performance management to protect trust.
  • Complete the KEEP Reflection and Planning Tool (EEF, 2025).

References

Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, C. and Elliot Major, L. (2014) What makes great teaching? Available at: https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/What-Makes-Great-Teaching-REPORT.pdf (Accessed: Monday 17 November 2025).

Education Endowment Foundation (2025) Metacognition and self-regulated learning. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/metacognition (Accessed: Monday 17 November 2025).

Education Endowment Foundation (2025) Effective Professional Development in 16-19 settings. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/16-19/continuing-professional-development (Accessed: Monday 17 November 2025).