Improving Literacy in Key Stage Two

  1. Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., Coleman, R., Henderson, P., Major, L.E., Coe, R. & Mason, D. (2015). The Sutton Trust- Education Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit. July 2015. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
  2. Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Schatschneider, C. and Torgesen, J. (2010) ‘Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide’ (NCEE 2010-4038), Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  3. National Reading Panel (U.S.) (2000) ‘Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction’, Washington DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 4-27.
  4. Goodwin, A. and Ahn, S. (2013) ‘A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children’, Scientific studies of reading, 17 (4), 257–285.
  5. Department for Education (2013) English programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2. National curriculum in England, London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335186/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_ English_220714.pdf
  6. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Collaborative learning
  7. Scarborough, H. S. (2001) ‘Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis) abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice’, in Neuman, S. and Dickinson, D. (eds), Handbook for research in early literacy, New York: Guilford Press (97–110).
  8. Price-Mohr, R. and Price, C. (2016) ‘Gender Differences in Early Reading Strategies: A Comparison of Synthetic Phonics Only with a Mixed Approach to Teaching Reading to 4–5 Year-Old Children’, Early Childhood Education Journal, 1-8.
    Savage, R., Burgos, G., Wood, E. and Piquette, N. (2015) ‘The Simple View of Reading as a framework for national literacy initiatives: a hierarchical model of pupil level and classroom level factors’, British Educational Research Journal, 41 (5), 820–844.
    Torgerson, C. J., Brooks, G. and Hall, J. (2006) ‘A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling’, London: Department for Education and Skills.
    Wyse, D. & Goswami, U. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 691–710.
  9. Swanson, H. and O’Connor, R. (2009) ‘The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers’, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42 (6), 548–575.
  10. National Reading Panel (U.S.) (2000) ‘Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction’, Washington DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 3-20.
  11. National Reading Panel (U.S.) (2000) ‘Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction’, Washington DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 3-15.
    Scott, A. Binder, K. Foster, T. and Zawoyski, M. (2016) ‘Repeated versus wide reading: a randomized control design study examining the impact of fluency interventions on underlying reading behaviour’, Journal of School Psychology, 59(6), 13-38.
    Therrien W. (2004) ‘Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading’, Remedial and Special Education, 25 (4), 252–261.
  12. McKenna, M. C. and Stahl, K. A. D. (2015) Assessment for Reading Instruction (3rd edn), New York: Guilford Publications.
  13. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Reading comprehension strategies
    Oakhill, J., Cain, K. and Elbro, C. (2014) Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: a handbook, London: Routledge.
  14. http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-06162010- 100830/unrestricted/Davis_dissertation.pdf
  15. National Reading Panel (2000) ‘Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups’, Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 4 - 39.
    National Reading Panel. (2000) ‘Teaching children to read:
    An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups’, Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 4 - 83.
    Stuart, M. and Stainthorp, R. (2015) Reading development and teaching, London: Sage.
  16. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Meta-cognition and self-regulation
  17. McKenna, M. C. and Stahl, K. A. D. (2015) Assessment for Reading Instruction (3rd edn), New York: Guilford Publications.
  18. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Collaborative learning Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Meta-cognition and self-regulation
  19. Pearson, P. D. and Gallagher, M. C. (1983) ‘The instruction of reading comprehension’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8 (3), 317–344.
  20. National Reading Panel (2000) ‘Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups’, Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 4-39.
  21. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Meta-cognition and self-regulation
  22. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Reading comprehension strategies
  23. Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D. and Olinghouse, N. (2012) ‘Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide’ (NCEE 2012-4058), Washington DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
    Graham, S., Bruch, J., Fitzgerald, J., Friedrich, L., Furgeson, J., Greene, K., Kim, J., Lyskawa, J., Olson, C. B. and Smither Wulsin, C. (2016) ‘Teaching secondary students to write effectively (NCEE 2017-4002), Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  24. Pearson, P. D. and Gallagher, M. C. (1983) ‘The instruction of reading comprehension’ Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8 (3), 317–344.
  25. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Peer tutoring
  26. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Collaborative learning Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Peer tutoring
  27. Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D. and Olinghouse, N. (2012) ‘Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide’ (NCEE 2012-4058), Washington DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  28. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/tools/ projects/using-self-regulation-to-improve-writing
  29. McCutchen, D. (2000) ‘Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing’, Educational Psychologist, 35 (1), 13–23.
  30. Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D. and Olinghouse, N. (2012) ‘Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide’ (NCEE 2012-4058), Washington DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  31. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Feedback McGraham, S. and Harris, K.R. (2005) ‘Improving the writing performance of young struggling readers writers: theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning’, The Journal of Special Education, 39 (1), 19–33.
  32. Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low G., Robinson A. and Zhu D. (2004) ‘The effect of grammar teaching (sentence combining) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition’, Research Evidence in Education Library, London: EPPI- Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
    Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B., Curtin, G., & Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291-304.
    Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D. and Olinghouse, N. (2012) ‘Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide’, (NCEE 2012-4058), Washington DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
    Saddler, B. and Graham, S. (2005) ‘The effects of peer- assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (1), 43–54.
  33. Department for Education (2012) ‘What is the research evidence on writing?’, Research report DFE-RR238, London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/.../DFE-RR238.pdf
  34. https://www.region10.org/r10website/assets/File/ Beyond%20Standardized%20Test%20Scores%20Handout%20Louisa%20Moats.pdf
  35. Fisher, B., Cozens, M. E. and Greive, C. (2007) ‘Look-say-cover-write-say-check and old way/new way - mediational learning: A comparison of the effectiveness of two tutoring programs for children with persistent spelling difficulties’, Special Education Perspectives, 16 (1), 19–38 (http://research.avondale.edu.au/edu_papers/31).
    Goodwin, A. P. and Ahn, S. (2010) ‘A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties’, Annals of Dyslexia, 60 (2), 183–208.
    Nunes, T. and Bryant, P. (2006) Improving Literacy through Teaching Morphemes, London: Routledge; Goodwin, A., and Ahn, S. (2013) ‘A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children’, Scientific studies of reading, 17 (4), 257–285.
  36. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Feedback
  37. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-teachers-workload/reducing-teachers-workload
  38. Elliott, V., Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T., Ingram, J., Thompson, I., Usher, N., Zantout, M., Richardson, J. and Coleman, R. (2016) ‘A Marked Improvement? A review of the evidence on written marking’, London: Education Endowment Foundation. {page_317} public/files/Publications/EEF_Marking_Review_April_2016.pdf
  39. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Feedback
  40. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M. and Beishuizen, J. (2010) ‘Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research’, Educational Psychology Review, 22 (3), 271–296.
  41. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C. and Wagner, R. K. (2014) ‘To wait in Tier I or intervene immediately: a randomized experiment examining first-grade response to intervention in reading’, Exceptional Children, 81 (1), 11–27.
    Berninger, V. W. and Amtmann, D. (2003) ‘Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice’, in Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R. and Graham, S. (eds), Handbook of Learning Disabilities, New York: Guilford (345–363).
    Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M. A. and Capin, P. (2015) ‘Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grade K-3’, Educational Psychology Review, 28 (3), 551–576.
  42. {page_317} resources/assessing-and-monitoring-pupil-progress/ developing-whole-school-assessment/diagnostic- assessment/
  43. McKenna, M. C. and Stahl, K. A. D. (2015) Assessment for Reading Instruction (3rd edn), New York: Guilford Publications.
  44. Snowling, M. J. and Hulme, C. (2011) ‘Evidence-based interventions for reading and language difficulties: creating a virtuous circle’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (1), 1–23.
  45. Clarke, P.J., Snowling, M.J., Truelove, E. & Hulme, C. (2010) Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties: a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Science. 21(8) 1106-1116.
  46. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Digital technology
  47. Graham, S. and Perin, D. (2007) ‘A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (3), 445–476.
  48. Morphy, P. and Graham, S. (2012) ‘Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings’, Reading and Writing, 25 (3), 641–678.
  49. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): Digital technology
  50. Higgins, S., Xiao, Z. and Katsipataki, M. (2012) ‘The impact of digital technology on learning: a summary for the Education Endowment Foundation’, London: EEF. {page_317}public/ files/Publications/The_Impact_of_Digital_Technologies_on_ Learning_(2012).pdf
  51. Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S. and Madden, N. A. (2011) ‘Effective programs for struggling readers: A best- evidence synthesis’, Educational Research Review, 6 (1), 1–26. http://www.bestevidence.org/word/strug_read_ jun_02_2010.pdf
    Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S. and Stuebing, K. K. (2015) ‘A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Struggling Readers in Grades 4–12 1980–2011’, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48 (4), 369–390.
  52. van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J. and Fox, J. P. (2016) ‘Assessing the Effects of a School-Wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools’, American Educational Research Journal, 53 (2), 360–394.
  53. {page_317}school- themes/literacy/
  54. http://www.evidence4impact.org.uk/index.php
  55. Brooks, G. (2016) What Works for Children and Young People with Literacy Difficulties? The Effectiveness of Intervention Schemes (5th edn), Bracknell: Dyslexia-SpLD Trust.
  56. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2015): One to one tuition
    Sharples, J., Webster, R. and Blatchford, P. (2015) ‘Making Best Use of Teaching Assistants, Guidance Report’, London: EEF. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Publications/Campaigns/TA_Guidance_Report_MakingBestUseOfTeachingAssisstants-Printable.pdf
    Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S. and Madden, N. A. (2011) ‘Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis’, Educational Research Review, 6 (1), 1–26.
  57. Cowen, N and Cartwright, N. (2014) ‘Making the most of the evidence in education: a guide for working out what works... here and now’, Chess Working Paper, 2014 (3), 1-28.
  58. {page_317}diy/ https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/ assessing-and-monitoring-pupil-progress/
  59. D’Agostino, J. V. and Harmey, S. J. (2016) ‘An International Meta-Analysis of Reading Recovery’, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 21 (1), 29–46.
    Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S. and Madden, N. A. (2011) ‘Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis’, Educational Research Review, 6 (1), 1-26.
  60. Sharples, J., Webster, R. & Blatchford, P. (2015) Making Best Use of Teaching Assistants Guidance Report. London: EEF https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Publications/Campaigns/TA_Guidance_Report_MakingBestUseOfTeachingAssisstants-Printable.pdf
  61. Ibid.