About the measure
Versionⓘ
Third Edition (ART3)
Previous version(s)ⓘ
ART, ART2
Subject
Literacy
Third Edition (ART3)
ART, ART2
Literacy
Scores for 4 different strands (literal comprehension, vocabulary, comprehension requiring inference and comprehension requiring analysis). However, they are all administered within the same test (not subtests).
RS Assessment from Hodder Education
https://www.risingstars-uk.com/subjects/assessment/art
Yes
Yes
11 – 14 years
Key Stage 3
Yes
2018
N/a
Yes
Yes
Shortlisted
Reading (comprehension, vocabulary)
Forms A and B are parallel forms for upper primary or lower secondary. Forms C and D are parallel forms for upper secondary or adulthood. There is an ART interactive version (digital) as well as the paper version.
No
Individual, Small group, Whole class
30 minutes
Booklet and pen or pencil. Interactive version on computer or tablet.
N/a
Paper and Pencil
Computer or tablet
Flat
Not stated (no)
N/a
User manual
Raw scores, percentiles, age standardised scores (by age (range 70 – 130) and cohort/year (range 60 – 149)), reading age equivalents (5/6 years to 20 years), patterns of strength and weakness.
Two alternative standardised scores: (1) by year cohort and (2) age standardised scores.
1 month for age standardised scores below age 12, 2 months for scores age 12; 0 and above.
Simple manual scores key (clerical skills required) or computer scoring with manual entry of responses from paper form using an online service.
Online
Specific literacy (reading comprehension)
Specific measure of literacy measuring reading comprehension. The correlation between age and raw performance is reported: form A, Pearsons r = 0.713; form B, Pearsons r = 0.633. No correlations with age reported for forms C and D. No measures of construct validity are reported in the administration manual (McCarty & Crumpler, 2018).
None available to review.
Excellent internal consistency is reported in the administration manual for forms A (Cronbachs alpha 0.95) and B (Cronbach’s alpha 0.94), but not for forms C and D (McCarty & Crumpler, 2018). However, no information is given about the sample. Good equivalence reliability is reported in the administration manual (McCarty & Crumpler, 2018), but only for a restricted age range (11 – 14 years) and only for 2 forms. Correlations between two different forms of the test taken within two weeks of each other were between 0.79 and 0.85. Authors report that this study was with a large and representative sample of Year 7, 8 and 9 pupils from 10 secondary schools.
Norming sample size is excellent, however no information is given about sample selection or representativeness. All testing for forms A and B took place between Sept and Dec 2005, i.e. at the start of the school year, so may not reflect performance at other points in the school year. In 2013, students in Years 7, 8 and 9 took two of the four forms. Forms A and B were presented in an invariant order (e.g. A followed by B), which may result in order effects.
McCarty, C., & Crumpler, M. (2018). Access Reading Tests: Forms A, B, C & D: Third Edition manual. London, UK: RS Assessment from Hodder Education.