Education Endowment Foundation: Access Reading Tests – Third Edition

About the measure

Version

Third Edition (ART3)

Previous version(s)

ART, ART2

Subject

Literacy

Assessment screening

Subscales

Scores for 4 different strands (literal comprehension, vocabulary, comprehension requiring inference and comprehension requiring analysis). However, they are all administered within the same test (not subtests).

Publisher

RS Assessment from Hodder Education

Test source

https://www.risingstars-uk.com/subjects/assessment/art

Guidelines available?

Yes

Norm-referenced scores

Yes

Age range

11 – 14 years

Key Stage

Key Stage 3

UK standardisation sample

Yes

Publication date

2018

Re-norming date

N/​a

Eligibility

Validity measures available?

Yes

Reliability measures available?

Yes

note whether shortlisted, and reasons why not if relevant

Shortlisted

Administration format

Additional information about what the test measures

Reading (comprehension, vocabulary)

Are additional versions available?

Forms A and B are parallel forms for upper primary or lower secondary. Forms C and D are parallel forms for upper secondary or adulthood. There is an ART interactive version (digital) as well as the paper version.

Can subtests be administered in isolation?

No

Administration Group Size

Individual, Small group, Whole class

Administration duration

30 minutes

Description of materials needed to administer test

Booklet and pen or pencil. Interactive version on computer or tablet.

Any special testing conditions?

N/​a

Response format

Response mode

Paper and Pencil

What device is required?

Computer or tablet

Progress through questions

Flat

Assessor requirements

Is any prior knowledge/training/profession accreditation required for administration?

Not stated (no)

Is administration scripted?

N/​a

Assessor requirements

Description of materials needed to score test

User manual

Types and range of available scores

Raw scores, percentiles, age standardised scores (by age (range 70 – 130) and cohort/​year (range 60 – 149)), reading age equivalents (5/6 years to 20 years), patterns of strength and weakness.

Score transformation for standard score

Two alternative standardised scores: (1) by year cohort and (2) age standardised scores.

Age bands used for norming

1 month for age standardised scores below age 12, 2 months for scores age 12; 0 and above.

Scoring procedures

Simple manual scores key (clerical skills required) or computer scoring with manual entry of responses from paper form using an online service.

Automatised norming

Online

Construct Validity

Rating Construct

Does it reflect the multidimensionality of the subject?

Specific literacy (reading comprehension)

Construct validity comments (and reference for source)

Specific measure of literacy measuring reading comprehension. The correlation between age and raw performance is reported: form A, Pearsons r = 0.713; form B, Pearsons r = 0.633. No correlations with age reported for forms C and D. No measures of construct validity are reported in the administration manual (McCarty & Crumpler, 2018).

Criterion Validity

Rating Criterion

Summarise available comparisons

None available to review.

Reliability

Rating Reliability

Summarise available comparisons

Excellent internal consistency is reported in the administration manual for forms A (Cronbachs alpha 0.95) and B (Cronbach’s alpha 0.94), but not for forms C and D (McCarty & Crumpler, 2018). However, no information is given about the sample. Good equivalence reliability is reported in the administration manual (McCarty & Crumpler, 2018), but only for a restricted age range (11 – 14 years) and only for 2 forms. Correlations between two different forms of the test taken within two weeks of each other were between 0.79 and 0.85. Authors report that this study was with a large and representative sample of Year 7, 8 and 9 pupils from 10 secondary schools.

Is the norm-derived population appropriate and free from bias?

Does the standardisation sample represent the target/general population well?

If any biases are noted in sampling, these will be indicated here.

Norming sample size is excellent, however no information is given about sample selection or representativeness. All testing for forms A and B took place between Sept and Dec 2005, i.e. at the start of the school year, so may not reflect performance at other points in the school year. In 2013, students in Years 7, 8 and 9 took two of the four forms. Forms A and B were presented in an invariant order (e.g. A followed by B), which may result in order effects.

Sources

Sources

McCarty, C., & Crumpler, M. (2018). Access Reading Tests: Forms A, B, C & D: Third Edition manual. London, UK: RS Assessment from Hodder Education.