About the measure
Versionⓘ
4th Edition
Previous version(s)ⓘ
LASS secondary, 1st, 2nd and 3rd editions. Note that LASS 8 – 11 is also available for primary age.
Subject
Literacy
4th Edition
LASS secondary, 1st, 2nd and 3rd editions. Note that LASS 8 – 11 is also available for primary age.
Literacy
Single word reading, sentence reading, spelling, reasoning, mbile (auditory memory), cave (visual memory), nonwords (phonics skills), and phonological processing (segments).
Lucid/GL Assessment
https://www.gl-assessment.co.uk/products/lucid-lass-11 – 15/
Yes
Yes
11 – 15 years
Key Stage 3, Key Stage 4
Yes
2010
N/a
Yes
Yes
Shortlisted
Word reading, spelling, sentence reading.
There is a parallel form of LASS for younger children (LASS 8 – 11). Previous editions have swapped between being called LASS Secondary and LASS 11 – 15.
Yes
Individual, Small group
45 minutes (5 minutes per subtest)
Computer, headphones or speakers, keyboard and mouse.
No
Electronic
Computer or tablet
Mixed
Adaptive for sentence reading, spelling and reasoning. Flat for word reading, nonword reading, segments and cave. Discontinue rule for mobile.
No
N/a
Computerised scoring
Age standardised scores, stanines (1 – 9), percentile, T‑score, z‑score
Age standardised
3 months
Computer scoring with direct entry by test taker.
Computerised
Generic literacy (with specific subtests)
The teacher’s manual (Horne et al., 2010) illustrates construct validity is through correlations with other appropriate instruments. Construct validity is excellent for sentence reading and spelling, and adequate for reasoning and the diagnostic measures. Sentence reading correlates with NFER sentence completion at r = .75. Spelling correlates with British Spelling Test Series 3 at r = .88. Reasoning correlates with Matrix analogies test r = .52. Caves correlates with Wechsler Memory Scales Spatial span r = .37. Mobile with WMS digit span r = .55. Nonwords with PhAB nonword reading r = .43. Segments with PhAB spoonerisms r = .45. Contrasted group validity is also reported in the teacher’s manual (Horne et al., 2010). A study with 30 students with dyslexia who showed lower scores on all tests except reasoning and visual memory. 17 students with other SEN showed lower scores on all tests. 79% of students with dyslexia were correctly identified.
None available to review.
Internal consistency is not reported. Temporal stability is illustrated in a study with a 4 week test-retest interval which is reported in the Teacher’s Manual (Horne et al., 2010). The coefficients can be summarised as indicating good stability for literacy measures (sentence reading .85; spelling .93); adequate for nonwords and segments (nonwords .77; segments .74) and inadequate for reasoning, cave and mobile (reasoning .51; cave .53; mobile .58).
Sample size is good but insufficient information is provided about sample procedures and demographics to confirm that the norming sample was free from bias.
Horne, J., Keates, A., & Stansfield, J. (2010). LASS 11 – 15: Lucid Assessment System for Schools for ages 11 to 15 years. Teacher’s manual. Beverley, UK: Lucid Research Ltd.