Education Endowment Foundation: Wechsler Individual Achievement Test – Third UK Edition

About the measure

Version

WIAT-III UK/WIAT-III UK‑T

Previous version(s)

WIAT, WIAT-II, WIAT-II UK, WIAT-II UK‑T (literacy only), WIAT-III, WIAT-III UK, WIAT-III UK‑T (literacy only)

Subject

Literacy

Assessment screening

Subscales

8 composite scores: (1) Oral Language, (2) Total Reading, (3) Basic Reading, (4) Reading Comprehension and Fluency, (5) Written Expression, (6) Mathematics, (7) Maths Fluency, (8) Total Achievement. 16 subtests: listening comprehension, oral expression, early reading skills, word reading, pseudoword decoding, reading comprehension, oral reading fluency, alphabet writing fluency, spelling, sentence composition, essay composition, maths problem solving, numeracy, maths fluency (addition, subtraction, multiplication).

Publisher

Pearson Clinical

Test source

https://www.pearsonclinical.co.uk/Psychology/ChildCognitionNeuropsychologyandLanguage/ChildAchievementMeasures/wiat-iii/wechsler-individual-achievement-test-third-uk-edition-wiat-iii-uk.aspx

Guidelines available?

Yes

Norm-referenced scores

Yes

Age range

4 – 25;11 years

Key Stage

Key Stage 1, Key Stage 2, Key Stage 3, Key Stage 4, Key Stage 5

UK standardisation sample

Yes

Publication date

2017

Re-norming date

N/​a

Eligibility

Validity measures available?

Yes

Reliability measures available?

Yes

note whether shortlisted, and reasons why not if relevant

Shortlisted

Administration format

Are additional versions available?

WIAT-IIIUK (reviewed here) is a significant revision of WIAT-IIUK, including updated norms, new subtests, revised subtests with new items. Based on WIAT-III (US version). See also WIAT-IIIUK‑T.

Can subtests be administered in isolation?

Yes (note that some subtests cover specific age ranges).

Administration Group Size

Individual

Administration duration

Dependent on many factors. Administration times for each subtest by age and ability is presented on p12 of examiner’s manual. Total achievement composite 30 minutes – 60 minutes for younger children, 1.5 – 2 hours for older children/​adults. Few subtests should take >15 minutes to administer.

Description of materials needed to administer test

Materials included in the test kit: examiner’s manual (once familiar with procedures, the manual states that the examiner will not need to use the manual during administration); simulus book; oral reading fluency booklet; word card; pseudoword card; record form; response booklet; scoring workbook; audio files (on USB flashdrive). Other recommended materials: clipboard; stopwatch/​watch with second hand; audio recorder; audio player with external speakers; blank paper (blank/​lined depending on subtests being administered); pencils with and without rubbers.

Any special testing conditions?

Well lit, quiet environment free from disruptions and interruptions. 4 – 8 year olds should not have alphabet displayed in the room.

Response format

Response mode

Oral, Paper and Pencil

What device is required?

N/​a

Question format

Open ended

Progress through questions

Adaptive

Assessor requirements

Is any prior knowledge/training/profession accreditation required for administration?

Yes

Is administration scripted?

(See p7 of Examiner’s Manual.) Chartered and research psychologists who are involved in psychological or educational testing and who have training in the use of individually administered assessment instruments are qualified to administer and interpret the WIAT-IIIUK. In all cases, examiners should have training in the fundamental principles of assessment procedures, including how to establish and maintain rapport, elicit optimum performance, follow standardised administration procedures, understand psychometric statistics, score and interpret tests, and maintain test security. The examiner should have experience in testing students whose ages, linguistic backgrounds, clinical, cultural, and educational histories are similar to those of the students tested with the WIAT-IIIUK. Specialist teachers who hold suitable qualifications can administer the subtests and score the responses under the supervision of a chartered or research psychologist. Only individuals who have recieved professional training in educational or psychological assessment should interpret the results of the WIAT-IIIUK. These user qualifications are consistent with the guidelines set forth in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (Standards; American Educational Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999), and the International Guidelines for Test Use: Version 2000 (International Test Comission [ITC], 2000).

Assessor requirements

Description of materials needed to score test

Examiner’s manual, scoring workbook (for alphabet writing fluency, sentence composition and essay composition subtests), UK Scoring and Normative manual or Qglobal subscription.

Types and range of available scores

Raw scores on each subtest; weighted raw scores (corrected for item set) by subtest and composit; standard score by age (40 – 160 — available for each subtest, composit and overall achievement, and analyses of differences are provided to allow users to determine whether differences in subscale performance are significant); Percentile Rank (1 – 99 — available for each subtest, composit and overall achievement); age equivalent (4;00 – 25 — available for each subtest, composit and overall achievement); normal curve equivalent (1 – 99); Stanine (1 – 9); cumulative percentages. Skills analyses can be conducted on most subtests. Users are also encouraged to provide behavioural and qualitative observations on the record form to support interpretation.

Score transformation for standard score

Age standardised

Age bands used for norming

4;00 – 13;11 at 4 month intervals. Combined intervals for ages 17 – 19 and 20 – 25 (reflecting slower rate of academic change in older ages).

Scoring procedures

Using manuals: complex manual scoring — training required. Annual subscription to Qglobal: computer scoring with manual entry of responses from paper form.

Automatised norming

Computerised/​online

Construct Validity

Rating Construct

Does it reflect the multidimensionality of the subject?

Generic literacy and generic maths (with specific subtests)

Construct validity comments (and reference for source)

Good detail about face validity for use for diagnostic purposes. Adaptations needed for Anglicisation from WIAT-III described in detail to the examiner’s manual and the UK scoring and normative manual. Construct validity is supported by moderate-strong intercorrelations between subtest age-based standard scores (.37 – .99), as well as appropriate correlations with previous versions of the WIAT. 79 children aged 6;2 – 16;10 completed WIAT-IIIUK and WIAT-IIUK with a testing interval of 14 – 49 days. Correlations were high or moderate for similar subtests (word reading .81; spelling .83) and lower for dissimilar subtests (word reading and numerical operations .28). The US version also shows good evidence of construct validity through correlations and discrepancy analyses with other measures (e.g. WPPSI-IV, WAIS-IV) and these findings are likely to transfer to the UK edition. See UK Scoring and Normative Manual for further detail. Evidence of contrasted group validity would have further supported diagnostic use, however would not be possible from the standardisation sample due to the nature of exclusionary criteria and stratification in sampling.

Criterion Validity

Rating Criterion

Summarise available comparisons

None available to review.

Reliability

Rating Reliability

Summarise available comparisons

The UK scoring and normative manual indicates good reliability. Good-excellent internal consistency (coefficients .81 – .97; SEM 1.5 – 8.35) (presented by age group and overall for each subtest). 95% confidence intervals 3 – 16; 90% confidence intervals 2 – 13 (presented by age group and subtest). Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability are not reported in the UK version of the test. However, other measures of validity are available that were established on the WIAT-III US standaridsation, which are likely to be somewhat transferable, but here we limit to discussion of the UK studies.

Is the norm-derived population appropriate and free from bias?

Does the standardisation sample represent the target/general population well?

If any biases are noted in sampling, these will be indicated here.

Sampling for standardisation is excellent — WIAT-IIIUK standardisation project aimed to provide UK norms based on a census-matched sample of 744 UK children aged 4;0 – 25;11. Sample was recruited through a range of methods described in detail (see p355 of the UK scoring and normative manual) and stratified by gender, age, parent educational level, race/​ethnicity, geographic region. A number of exclusion criteria were included, meanwhile one participant with form diagnosis of learning difficulty and one participant labelled as gifted and talented were included in each age band. Detailed information about sample demographics compared to census data are provided in the UK scoring and normative manual.

Sources

Sources

Wechsler, D. (2017). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test – Third UK Edition. Examiner’s Manual. London, UK: Pearson Assessment. Breaux, K. C. (2017). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test – Third Edition. Technical Manual With Adult Norms. Bloomington, MN, USA: Pearson Clinical Assessment/​PsychCorp. Pearson Development Team (2017). Weschler Individual Achievement Test – Third UK Edition. UK Scoring and Normative Manual. London, UK: Pearson Assessment.