Magic Breakfast

This is an updated project page. The original report was published in November 2016, with an update to the report in December 2019. Differences between the two reports are clearly detailed in the updated project report.

The Magic Breakfast project provided schools with support and resources to offer a free, universal, before-school breakfast club, including to all Year 2 and Year 6 pupils. The aim of the project was to improve attainment outcomes by increasing the number of children who ate a healthy breakfast.

school

Cross curriculum

Subject

accessibility

Key Stage 1

Key stage

EEF Summary

At the time of funding this project there had been considerable interest in school meals, including the introduction of universal infant free school meals and breakfast club pilots in England, and new policy on breakfast provision in Wales. We funded this project because despite the policy interest, there was limited evidence of the impact of breakfast clubs on attainment. This study was a control group study.

Our updated evaluation found that supporting schools to run a free of charge, universal breakfast club before school delivered an average of 2 months’ additional progress for pupils in Key Stage 1 with moderate to low security. An impact on attainment was not seen for pupils in Key Stage 2. Interestingly, it appears that it was not whether more pupils ate breakfast at all that made the difference, but whether more were going to the school breakfast club. It may be that school breakfasts are more nutritious, or that attending the club effectively prepares pupils for learning. Breakfast club schools also saw an improvement in pupil behaviour and attendance.

Schools considering providing breakfasts may want to focus on Key Stage 1 pupils if their primary aim for doing this is raising attainment and they should also aim to deliver a breakfast club similar to the model tested here: free, universal and before school. 

Research Results

KS1 Maths

+2
Months' Progress
Evidence Strength

KS1 Reading

+2
Months' Progress
Evidence Strength

KS1 Writing

+2
Months' Progress
Evidence Strength

KS2 Reading

0
Months' Progress
Evidence Strength

KS2 Maths

0
Months' Progress
Evidence Strength

Were the schools in the trial similar to my school?

106 schools took part in the trial. 71 of which were rated good or outstanding by Ofsted.

56% of pupils have ever been eligible for free school meals. 23% of pupils had special educational needs.

Could I implement this in my school?

Magic Breakfast is a charity that supports schools in providing healthy breakfasts to children. More information on Magic Breakfast can be found here

account_circle

Teachers

Delivered by

language

Whole School

Participant group

date_range

1 Year

Intervention length

How much will it cost?

The cost per pupil per year over three years is £11.86, averaged across all pupils in the breakfast club schools. The total cost was, on average, £4,462.11 per school. In addition, schools used 820 person-hours per year to deliver the intervention. On average, this included 87 teacher hours, 449 teaching assistant hours, 164 support staff hours, and 100 volunteer hours over the year.

£

£12

Cost per pupil

today

0.0 Days

Training time per staff member

Evaluation info

Schools

100

Pupils

8,600

Key Stage

Key Stage 1

Start date

January 2014

End date

January 2017

Type of trial

Effectiveness Trial

Evaluation Conclusions

  1. Year 2 children in breakfast club schools made the equivalent of two months’ additional progress compared to Year 2 children in the business as usual control group. This result has a low to moderate security rating. These results are similar to the original results, although they are now less secure.

  2. There is no evidence that breakfast clubs had an impact on Year 6 pupil outcomes. This result has moderate to high security. Compared to the original results, the effect size for Year 6 pupils is lower and less secure.

  3. The findings suggest that, where improvements are seen, it is not just eating breakfast that delivers improvements but attending a breakfast club. This could be due to the content of the breakfast itself or to other social or educational benefits of the club.

  4. Pupil behaviour, as measured by a teacher survey, improved in breakfast club schools. This is interesting because it shows that breakfast clubs may improve outcomes for children who do not even attend breakfast club by improving classroom environments. This key conclusion is unchanged from the original report.

  5. Activities thought to increase take-up of the breakfast provision included promoting it to parents and encouraging all children to attend while sensitively targeting pupils most likely to benefit. The project required additional staff time which some schools found difficult to provide without charging for breakfast. This key conclusion is unchanged from the original report. All findings from the process evaluation are unaffected by the error in the impact evaluation.


  1. Updated: 13th December, 2019

    Printable project summary

    1 MB pdf - EEF-magic-breakfast.pdf

  2. Updated: 8th February, 2016

    Project Protocol

    453 KB pdf - EEF_Project_Protocol_MagicBreakfast.pdf

  3. Updated: 12th December, 2019

    Revised evaluation report

    3 MB pdf - Magic_Breakfast_report.pdf

  4. Updated: 12th December, 2019

    Magic Breakfast peer review statement

    78 KB pdf - Peer_Review_statement.pdf

Full project description

keyboard_arrow_down