Same Day Intervention

Same Day Intervention (SDI) is a mathematics intervention developed and delivered by a partnership between Yorkshire and the Humber Maths Hub and Outwood Institute of Education. In this trial it was delivered to Year 5 pupils (age 9-10).

Usual mathematics lessons are replaced with 75-minute SDI lessons, which are separated into three parts. In part one, teachers teach a mathematics concept before giving pupils questions to assess their understanding. In part two, teachers then mark pupil responses, while pupils attend an assembly or are taught by a Teaching Assistant (TA). In the final part, the teacher then uses the assessment to separate the class into two, providing additional instruction to pupils who performed less well in the test, while a TA supports the rest of the class. In this trial, SDI mathematics lessons were delivered daily for 7 months.

exposure

Maths

Subject

accessibility

Key Stage 2

Key stage

EEF Summary

The EEF’s Improving Mathematics in Key Stages Two and Three: Evidence Review explains that mastery approaches in maths are supported by some evidence (Hodgen et al 2018). However, this evidence is drawn largely from US studies, and further research is required into the efficacy of mastery-based approaches in English schools, which are becoming increasingly popular. SDI features components of mastery learning (such as frequent feedback, and extra time for pupils who struggle), while also drawing upon other promising approaches identified by the EEF review (such as feedback and formative assessment). Yorkshire and the Humber Maths Hub and Outwood Institute of Education aimed to use the approach to improve maths attainment for all pupils, while also narrowing the attainment gap between lower and higher attaining pupils. Given that the intervention requires teachers to mark in lesson, it was also hypothesised that SDI may reduce teacher workload, with teachers having less to mark outside of the classroom.

In this trial, pupils in Same Day Intervention (SDI) schools made, on average, 0 additional months’ progress compared to those in the control equivalent, and this result had a moderate to high security rating. Exploratory analysis finds the same result for children eligible for Free School meals.

Half of teachers in SDI schools provided data on the time they spent marking pupil work, and there was evidence they spent less time marking than teachers in control schools (approximately one hour less per week). However, given that data is only available for half of teachers, this should be treated with caution. Findings from the Implementation and Process Evaluation also suggested that marking time may have decreased, however, it also indicated that the time taken to plan lessons may have increased. Teachers in SDI schools were more likely than teachers in control schools to report that all pupils, and lower achieving pupils, were more confident compared to the previous year’s pupils. It should be noted that this is the perception of teachers, rather than pupils. Pupil focus groups in case study schools suggested that pupils had mixed feelings towards SDI.

Less than half of intervention schools implemented SDI as intended, and schools faced several challenges which made effective implementation difficult. For instance, schools were required to ensure a TA was present in every Year 5 mathematics lesson, as their support was a core component of the intervention. The post-intervention teacher survey found that 25% of schools always had a TA present, 46% regularly did, 18% only occasionally did, while 9% never did. Schools also found it challenging to adapt the school day so that sessions could last the intended 75 minutes. Other aspects of delivery (such as the approach to modelling concepts, pupil assessment questions and the division of the class into targeted groups) were often not implemented with fidelity, while attendance at training was also mixed. Only 55% of teachers attended all 3 compulsory training sessions.

The lack of impact on pupil attainment may not be solely due to poor implementation, as analysis suggested that complying with the intervention did not result in more positive outcomes. While poor implementation may have contributed, the lack of impact may also be due to the intervention having no impact or the programme not being taught for long enough. Another contributing factor may have been that control schools were using practices that were similar to those used in SDI, and the intervention may not have been sufficiently different to business as usual.

The EEF has no plans to fund a further trial of Same Day Intervention.

Research Results

Were the schools in the trial similar to my school?

73 schools (and 3,298 pupils) from Yorkshire and the Humber and surrounding areas participated in the trial

31% of pupils involved in the trial had been eligible for Free School Meals in the last 6 years 

Could I implement this in my school?

Teachers were required to attend three training sessions delivered by Outwood Institute of Education, the first of which was an Open Classroom where they observed an SDI lesson being taught. Training days two and three focused on the skills and activities required for the lessons. A member of SLT was also expected to attend the Open Classroom session, while TAs had the option of attending any of the days.

Teachers were also provided with exemplar lesson resources and ongoing online support.

Schools faced several barriers which made implementation difficult, and they found it challenging to implement key elements of the intervention such as providing a TA for every Year 5 maths lesson and adapting the school day to accommodate SDI lessons. Regular teacher absence due to other training commitments, the need to meet other whole school learning objectives set by SLT, and a lack of buy in from some teachers into SDI, made it difficult for schools to overcome these implementation challenges.

The intervention is commercially available from Outwood Institute of Education.

account_circle

SLT, Teachers, TAs

Delivered by

group_add

Whole Class

Participant group

date_range

1 Year

Intervention length

How much will it cost?

The cost to schools of delivering the Programme is very low: around £13.94 per pupil per year when averaged over three years. The intervention also requires approximately 130 days of school staff time per year to deliver SDI, in addition to 74 school staff days spent preparing outside of school, alongside 5 days of training, and 6 days of lesson cover.

£

£14

Cost per pupil

people_outline

2

No. of Teachers/TAs

today

5 Days

Training time per staff member

Evaluation info

Schools

73

Pupils

3,298

Key Stage

Key Stage 2

Start date

December 2017

End date

November 2020

Type of trial

Efficacy Trial

Evaluation Conclusions

  1. Pupils in Same Day Intervention schools made the equivalent of zero additional months’ progress in mathematics, on average, compared to pupils in control schools. This result has a moderate to high security rating.

  2. Half of teachers in Same Day Intervention schools provided data on the time they spent marking pupil work, and there was evidence that they spent less time marking than teachers in control schools (approximately one hour less per week). Teachers in Same Day Intervention schools were also more likely than teachers in control schools to report that all pupils, and lower achieving pupils, were more confident compared to the previous year’s pupils.

  3. Exploratory analysis suggests that pupils eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) in Same Day Intervention schools made the equivalent of zero months’ progress in mathematics, on average, compared to FSM pupils in control schools.

  4. Fewer than half of intervention schools implemented Same Day Intervention as intended. Schools faced several challenges which made implementation difficult, such as being able to provide a teaching assistant to support delivery and adapting the school day to extend mathematics lessons.


  1. Updated: 6th November, 2020

    Printable project summary

    1 MB pdf - EEF-same-day-intervention.pdf

  2. Updated: 5th November, 2020

    Evaluation report

    3 MB pdf - Same_Day_Intervention_evaluation_report_FINAL.pdf

  3. Updated: 15th April, 2019

    Evaluation Protocol

    376 KB pdf - SDI_protocol_150419_FINAL.pdf

  4. Updated: 23rd May, 2019

    Statistical Analysis Plan

    507 KB pdf - SDI_SAP_22052019_FINAL.pdf

Full project description

keyboard_arrow_down