Integrating maths into everyday routines

Improving Mathematics in the Early Years and Key Stage 1

Explore tips and strategies to help develop children's understanding of maths throughout the day.

Education Endowment Foundation

Education Endowment Foundation

Dedicate time for children to learn mathematics and integrate mathematics throughout the day

In the early years and Key Stage 1, there are opportunities throughout the day to learn about mathematics through the environment and through routines, as well as in dedicated teaching time. Throughout the day children should be exposed to mathematical language, both formal and informal, and practitioners should discuss mathematical ideas with children in order to extend their thinking.

Plan daily activities targeting specific maths concepts and skills

Practitioners should dedicate time each day for purposeful mathematics activity.1 This should focus on supporting children to develop specific mathematical ideas and skills, taking into account developmental progressions. Practitioners can use whole-class, large and small groups to tailor instruction for children who need support on different aspects of content. Approaches will look different for children at different developmental stages, and in the early years activities are likely to be short and active.

Mathematics can be explored through different contexts, including books, puzzles, songs, rhymes, puppet play and games. Using storybooks to teach mathematics can be particularly effective, through providing an opportunity for mathematical talk and questioning. Much of this evidence comes from studies where practitioners were explicitly supported in promoting mathematical discussion from the story, for example, by being provided with notecards displaying prompting questions and discussion points that they could use.3 Practitioners should therefore plan how they will use storybook resources to discuss mathematical concepts.

Box 2: Using storybooks

There are a number of mathematics story and picture books available across a range of ages that can be powerful in engaging children with mathematical concepts. Development and Research in Early Math Education (DREME), an early mathematics research network based at Stanford University, provides evidence-informed guidance for practitioners and parents on choosing books with appropriate mathematical content. It produces ‘Storybook Guides’ to support effective use of the books, including ways to maximise the mathematical talk.

Extract from resource for the storybook ‘Inside, Outside, Upside Down’ by Stan and Jan Berenstain (1996). Suitable for ages 2–4.

A bear gets in a box that gets turned upside down, taken outside, and put on a truck. Children learn about spatial words.

Mathematical talk during reading:

  • Talk about what is happening in the picture, emphasising words that describe spatial relationships—Do you see Brother Bear getting in the box? Where is the box going? How do you know?
  • Consider opposites—What is the opposite of going on the truck? What is the opposite of getting inside the box?
  • Make predictions—What might happen next in the story? If the box is upside down and we turn it around, will it still be upside down?

Extract from resource for the storybook ‘One is a Snail, Ten is a Crab’ by April and Jeff Sayre and Randy Cecil (2003). Suitable for ages 5–8.

Each page invites children to count the number of feet that people and different animals have.

Mathematical talk during reading:

  • Explore counting the number of feet in different animals—How many feet does an insect have? Can you show me with your fingers?
  • Practise adding one more—What happens when we add one foot? How many feet do we have altogether? How do you know?
  • Explore counting by groups of 10—If we have two crabs, how many feet do they have altogether? How do you know?

From Development and Research in Early Math Education.

Mathematics Through Stories, a U.K. organisation that promotes the teaching of mathematics through stories, is another useful source for stories and resources.

Games can be an engaging way to practise and extend skills. They can build on children’s mathematics knowledge, generate repeated practice in a motivating context, and give children and practitioners an opportunity to discuss strategies and ideas. Practitioners should select specific games to suit current objectives to provide appropriate challenge.

There is some evidence that board games with linearly arranged, consecutively numbered, and equal-sized spaces may be particularly beneficial to numerical understanding, by providing opportunities for developing strategies such as ‘counting on’.3 Snakes and Ladders is an example of a commercial board game that may support this, or practitioners may produce their own versions based on the research. An example from the Mathematical Reasoning project, evaluated by the EEF,4 is the caterpillar game (see Box 3).

Box 3: EEF Promising Project—Mathematical Reasoning

Mathematical Reasoning is a whole-class programme designed to develop pupils’ understanding of number and reasoning about quantity. The focus of the programme is on problem-solving, reasoning, and understanding, and concepts include the additive composition of number (the principle that numbers are composed of other smaller numbers combined), the inverse relation between addition and subtraction, and reasoning about multiplication and division. Each new concept is introduced through teacher-led activities during which the children use manipulativesobjects that educators and children can move and interact with to represent mathematical ideas (including fingers, everyday objects, such as buttons or pine cones, and mathematical resources such as Numicon, Cuisenaire rods). to enact a story problem. The programme also includes consolidation through games.

Example activity: Caterpillar game

In this whole-class activity, the teacher projects the slide on the board and the class plays as two teams racing to reach the end of the caterpillar. Each team throws the dice and pupils work out where their mark will be by counting on from where the marker is. In order to finish and win the game, the team must end exactly on the last square, requiring them to anticipate what number they need to finish and compare this with the number thrown.

The EEF conducted a randomised controlled trial of Mathematical Reasoning in Year 2 with 55 schools,5 where teachers were trained in the approach and provided with classroom exercises and training materials. Children who experienced the Mathematical Reasoning approach made an additional three months’ progress in mathematics compared to the control group. The EEF then funded a scaled-up evaluation6 in partnership with the National Centre for Excellence in Teaching Mathematics. In this second, larger trial, pupils who experienced Mathematical Reasoning made one month of additional progress compared to the control group. Mathematical Reasoning is an EEF Promising Project.

Reinforce mathematical vocabulary and create opportunities for discussion of mathematics

Practitioners should seize chances to reinforce mathematical vocabulary—for example by making a comment about which child is standing ‘first’, ‘second’, or ‘fourth’ in line, which child has ‘more than’ or ‘fewer’ objects than another child, or helping children rephrase statements that use ambiguous, non-mathematical language, such as refining ‘big’ when the child means ‘tall’.

It is important that children are supported to use informal language to describe mathematical ideas for example ‘more than’, ‘smaller than’, ‘pointy’, ‘curved’. Once children are comfortable with using informal language, practitioners can introduce more formal mathematical vocabulary.3 Practitioners need to consider how formal vocabulary is introduced. For example, it may be more beneficial to introduce formal names of shapes gradually rather than all at once then reinforce this as part of an ongoing routine. Practitioners in a setting could plan their use of mathematical language to ensure a consistent approach.

Practitioners should create opportunities for extended discussion of mathematical ideas with individuals or small groups of children in order to extend their thinking. This can be
particularly effective when a child is showing an interest in a certain problem or activity. A number of different frameworks exist to support high quality interactions, such as guided interaction8 and sustained shared thinking.9

Being highly tuned-in to the child’s behaviour and motivations, responsive to what children are saying and using a variety of techniques to help develop and extend children’s thinking are central to these approaches, which can be used while children engage in a variety of everyday activities.

Features of such approaches include:

  • the use of open-ended questions:
  • ‘How did you…?’, ‘Why does this…?’;
  • asking children to elaborate: ‘I really want to know more about this…’;
  • recapping: ‘So you think that…’; and
  • clarifying ideas: ‘So you think we should…?’.

Highlight mathematics across the day

Throughout the day there will be meaningful ways to use mathematics. Mathematics can be highlighted through daily routines, during play, and in other curriculum areas.

Everyday routines such as registration time, snack time, and tidying up provide opportunities for counting and comparison as well as addition, subtraction, sharing, and time problems. Practitioners should take advantage of such time to support mathematical development, for example, by engaging in mathematical conversations, singing a song, or playing a number game.

Box 4: Using routines to practise mathematics

Practitioners in a nursery class decided to use snack time to help the children to recognise numbers of objects and connect them to number words. During snack time they would point out, ‘We have three oranges that we are going to share out’, whilst showing the numbers on their fingers to reinforce the quantity. By encouraging the children to see the amount of something rather than only seeing the object—for example, the orange or cup—the practitioners were helping the children to develop the habit of quantifying small groups or collections. This enabled children to begin to build up a concept of number and connect number words with amounts.

A Year 1 team looked at the learning objectives for their year group and identified those which they thought could be effectively consolidated through classroom routines. One of these objectives was counting to 100 forwards and backwards. The teacher decided that every day when two children went to get the fruit, the others would count how long it took them. For the first few months they counted forwards. Sometimes they would just say the number names. On other days the teacher would also point to the numbers either on a 100 square or on a 0–100 number line. Later in the academic year, the class started counting backwards from 100.

The teacher was aware of typical challenges, such as saying 1 less than a multiple of 10 when counting backwards, so emphasised these numbers in her own counting. By using everyday routines in the school day, this provided additional opportunities for the children to develop fluency in important mathematical skills, and for the team to monitor the development of these.

Practitioners should provide a variety of tools to allow children to explore all areas of mathematics, and opportunities for outdoor provision should be maximised, where this is possible, for the development and reinforcement of mathematical ideas. Appropriate tools include manipulativesobjects that educators and children can move and interact with to represent mathematical ideas (including fingers, everyday objects, such as buttons or pine cones, and mathematical resources such as Numicon, Cuisenaire rods)., measuring items, scales, construction materials, puzzles, sorting and pattern materials.10 Building blocks may be especially important for developing children’s spatial awareness and knowledge of shapes.2 Children should have experiences with a wide variety of shapes. For example, exposure to a variety of triangles, rather than limited to certain types, such as equilateral or isosceles.1

Practitioners have an important role in scaffolding opportunities for learning and extending the learning during play. Through observing children’s play, practitioners will identify ‘teachable moments’ in which they can join the play to add to the discussion, reinforce mathematical vocabulary, and encourage problem-solving. Practitioners may find it useful to think about mathematics concepts, discussion points, and vocabulary related to the different play areas and activities so they can use them when appropriate moments arise.11

Box 5: Maths Champions, a whole setting approach to improving mathematics provision

Maths Champions is a programme to support nurseries to improve their mathematics provision run by the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA). The programme involves nursery settings allocating a senior member of staff to take the role of ‘Mathematics Champion’, responsible for raising the quality of mathematics provision in their setting. The Mathematics Champion receives online training on developing their own understanding of mathematical development, evaluating practice in their setting, and supporting other practitioners’ development.

Areas of focus include improving the mathematical environment, for example, the quality of resources available in the nursery to support mathematical learning, encouraging staff to use appropriate mathematical language in discussions with children, and supporting staff to plan opportunities for mathematical learning in play and activities.

An EEF trial evaluated the programme, which focused on children who were three years old at the start of the programme. After one year, children from nursery settings receiving Mathematics Champions made two months’ additional progress compared to business as usual control settings and there was suggestive evidence that the quality of maths provision in the participating nurseries was improved.12

Box 6: Highlighting mathematics during play

During outdoor play, two four-year-old children were taking turns to throw five beanbags into the nearest of a long line of tyres. The teaching assistant encouraged them to say how many they got in the tyre each time and how many were out, and to check that there were always five altogether.

She then set up a whiteboard so they could record their names and scores, either by making marks or by referring to the number track on the fence if they wanted to write numerals. In this way, the children were engaging with counting and values for number symbols, and beginning to see that five could be made up of smaller numbers. The teaching assistant then asked, ‘Can you get any beanbags in the next tyre? It’s a bit further away!’ They discussed how far the children could throw the beanbags and how many they got in the further tyres, referring to them as ‘first’, ‘second’, and ‘third’. The children were then beginning to use appropriate vocabulary to compare distances and describe numbers ordinally.

Practitioners can provide extra opportunities to explore mathematics by highlighting where mathematics exists elsewhere in the curriculum.3 However, practitioners should carefully consider how to embed purposeful mathematical learning opportunities at an appropriately challenging level. Physical education can be a particularly fruitful area for reinforcing and exploring the mathematical concepts of number, shape, and measure (see Box 7).

Box 7: Highlighting mathematics in another curriculum area

In a Year 2 PE lesson, the children were in pairs doing rallies of throws and catches, standing one and then two metres apart, to improve their ball skills. The teacher suggested they set themselves a target to beat and kept a score on their clipboards, which they did in lots of different ways.

The children were so interested in beating their own scores and setting themselves targets that when they got back in the classroom, they discussed the best way of recording their progress. For the next PE lesson the teacher suggested they record their scores by creating simple bar graphs on squared paper. After each rally the children quickly recorded their scores against the number on the horizontal axis, some colouring a square, some writing the number, and others doing tallies.

Back in the classrooms, as well as talking about their highest and most frequent scores, the children discussed which was the quickest method and which was easiest to read. The teacher introduced the idea of difference by asking, ‘What is your target for next time? How many more catches would you have to do to reach it?’

As the term progressed, the recording extended to estimating and measuring activities, such as lengths of long jumps and timing how long it took to run round a circuit with a digital timer (which led to discussion about the numerals after the decimal point, which the children decided to ignore). The teacher also set up a class graph of how long it took them to get changed for PE.


Improving Mathematics in the Early Years and Key Stage 1:

Use manipulatives and representations to develop understanding

References

  1. Cross, C. T., Woods , T. A. and Schweingruber, H. (2009) Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood: Paths Towards Excellence and Equity, Washington DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12519
  2. Frye, D., Baroody, A. J., Burchinal, M., Carver, S. M., Jordan, N. C. and McDowell, J. (2013) Teaching Math to Young Children: A Practice Guide (NCEE 2014-4005), Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Do...
  3. Purpura, D. J., Napoli, A. R., Wehrspann, E. A. and Gold, Z. S. (2017) ‘Causal Connections Between Mathematical Language and Mathematical Knowledge: A Dialogic Reading Intervention’, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10 (1), pp. 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/193457...
  4. Ramani, G. B. and Siegler, R. S. (2011) ‘Reducing the Gap in Numerical Knowledge Between Low- and Middle-Income Preschoolers’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32 (3), pp. 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appd...
  5. Stokes, L., Hudson-Sharp, N., Dorsett, R. et al. (2018) ‘Mathematical Reasoning: Evaluation report’, London: EEF. https://educationendowmentfoun...
  6. Worth, J., Sizmur, J., Ager, R. and Styles, B. (2015) ‘Improving Numeracy and Literacy: Evaluation report’, London: EEF. https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfr...
  7. Department for Children, Schools and Families (2009) Learning, Playing and Interacting – Good Practice in the Early Years Foundation Stagehttps://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/epri...
  8. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P. and Melhuish, E. (2008) ‘Towards the Transformation of Practice in Early Childhood Education: The Effective Provision of Pre‐School Education (EPPE) Project’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 38 (1), pp. 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/030576...
  9. Deans for Impact (2019) ‘The Science of Early Learning: How Young Children Develop Agency, Numeracy, and Literacy’, Austin, TX: Deans for Impact. https://deansforimpact.org/wp-...
  10. McCray, S., Chen, J., Eisenband-Sorkin, J. (2018) Growing Mathematical Minds: Conversations Between Developmental Psychologists and Early Childhood Teachers, New York: Routledge.
  11. Robinson-Smith, L., Fairhurst, C., Stone, G., Bell, K., Elliott, L., Gascoine, L., Hallett, S., Hewitt, C., Hugill, J., Torgerson, C., Torgerson, D., Menzies, V. and Ainsworth, H. (2018) ‘Maths Champions: Evaluation Report’, London: EEF. https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfr...

Improving Mathematics in the Early Years and Key Stage 1:

Use manipulatives and representations to develop understanding